|
One concern I'd have is possible hidden/constant parameters. This is a problem when calling directly to an IBM interface. Maybe have your SBMJOB execute the system SBMJOB with modified parameters, rather than a direct call to their CPP. Or is that what you meant? <g> > I have a requirement where I would like to create my own custom SBMJOB command > and slip it in place over the QSYS/SBMJOB Command. I will not be adding or > removing any parms, can still will be calling the same QSYS/QWTCCSBJ CPP. I > will be checking certain parms, such as *JOBD and *JOBQ and based upon the > current user profile, chang the values prior to passing onto the CPP. OS >Level > is V4R5 and Security Level is 30. > > The reason I am taking this approach is to "reverse engineer" into an existing > system that would be to costly in time and dollars to locate each and every > sbmjob and modify. > > Thanks - Jim > > > _______________________________________________ > This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list > To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l > or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives > at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l. >
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.