Re: Cheaper Servers?

["Dare @ Work" <oludare@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Evan,

Isn't it true that OS/2 reside on IBM compatible PC and it is too
proprietary anyway and not user friendly.  My thinking is to use current
OS400 hardware with the OS but portable.


Dare

----- Original Message -----
From: "Evan Harris" <spanner@ihug.co.nz>
To: <midrange-l@midrange.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 3:05 PM
Subject: Re: Cheaper Servers?


> Dare
>
> if this was true (and I *have* seen your response to James) we would all
be
> using OS/2
>
> I think OS/2's relative position in OS the market-place validates James'
> statements
>
> This is not to argue the relative technical merits of the two OS as that's
> another discussion...
>
> Cheers
> Evan Harris
>
>
> >I think a portable OS400 can give Windoze a ride for its money.  Not to
> >mention the stability of OS400 amongst many of its superior features.
Don't
> >quote me but we could break the monopoly of Microsoft on OS.
> >
> >Dare
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>