|
From: <barsa@barsaconsulting.com> To: <MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 9:12 PM Subject: Re: The demise of Midrange Computing - Is AS/400 is dead ? > IBM is in the highest corporate tax rate. Lets say for the sake of argument > that's 36%. With that in mind, today IBM pays a profit ox X, and pays a > tax of Y. If they advertised the AS/400, they would sell more of them. > The AS/400 is a high profit margin product, so certainly any advertising > they did would more than offset the expense in profits. Invalid assumption that advertising guarantees additional revenues. > Keep in mind, "relevant" platforms (despite however irrelevant they might > be) like Oracle, sponsored the first night of the World Series, but IBM > keeps silent on the iSeries. Oracle gets students coming out of college to > learn their technology, compared to a relative poor job that IBM is able to > do with the iSeries. Okay, hasn't IBM for years (decades) sponsered the Olympics, PGA tournaments, tennis tournaments, etc. ? But their problem has been that baseball is where the buyers are? Well I'll be! I know that IBM used to donate millions every year in hardware and support to colleges. I haven't looked in a few years, though, maybe Gerstner has cut those out. > The entire industry is having massive layoffs, but not the iSeries. Maybe too many companies are wasting money on ads that don't pay. > Is this a spoof comment, you bet it is. IBM is consistently spoofed by > their own senior management, by prohibiting the iSeries from doing > competitive advertising. The iSeries-AS/400 is the best computer > technology in the world. Let's keep the secret safe, and save IBM from > paying all those taxes. Personally, I think that's crazy. I don't think people run out looking to buy a platform and then go shopping for what programs they can buy to make it do something. IBM ads say that IBM has "solutions." Advertising the AS/400 or iSeries as a "solution" doesn't really make sense unless you know what kind of other factors there are in the shop you are working with. Where IBM fails is in making sure they pitch the 400 for every possible implementation. But maybe I'm wrong and they actually do. I mean, I would guess that most shops which come to IBM for the first time are already deploying an existing NT or Unix solution. In those cases, it might often be that the 400 is not going to fly with the customer. But I just can't imagine an exec seeing an ad during a baseball game and deciding he needed an AS/400, then buying one. Then, of course, he'd have to start asking around about what it could do for him. If a guy did this, what are the odds he's going to be the kind of customer who'll be happy with his system? Won't he be unhappy as soon as the next shiney new ad hits his TV screen? > Al - in Boston on vacation > > Al Barsa, Jr. > Barsa Consulting Group, LLC > > 400>390 Chris Rehm javadisciple@earthlink.net If you believe that the best technology wins the marketplace, you haven't been paying attention. +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.