|
Hi, IBM is in the highest corporate tax rate. Lets say for the sake of argument that's 36%. With that in mind, today IBM pays a profit ox X, and pays a tax of Y. If they advertised the AS/400, they would sell more of them. The AS/400 is a high profit margin product, so certainly any advertising they did would more than offset the expense in profits. So for every dollar they make in additional income (additional income from selling more AS/400s less advertising dollars), they would pay an additional $0.36 in taxes. That means they would keep an additional $0.64 in net profit. For every additional $1,000,000 in profit they would make, they would pay an additional $360,000 in taxes. That means that they would keep an additional $640,000 in net profit. God forbid that they would ever have to pay that additional $360,000 despite whatever other consequences (like additional net profit). Keep in mind, "relevant" platforms (despite however irrelevant they might be) like Oracle, sponsored the first night of the World Series, but IBM keeps silent on the iSeries. Oracle gets students coming out of college to learn their technology, compared to a relative poor job that IBM is able to do with the iSeries. The entire industry is having massive layoffs, but not the iSeries. Is this a spoof comment, you bet it is. IBM is consistently spoofed by their own senior management, by prohibiting the iSeries from doing competitive advertising. The iSeries-AS/400 is the best computer technology in the world. Let's keep the secret safe, and save IBM from paying all those taxes. Al - in Boston on vacation Al Barsa, Jr. Barsa Consulting Group, LLC 400>390 914-251-1234 914-251-9406 fax http://www.barsaconsulting.com http://www.taatool.com MacWheel99@aol.com Sent by: To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com owner-midrange-l@mi cc: drange.com Subject: Re: The demise of Midrange Computing - Is AS/400 is dead ? 08/01/01 01:52 PM Please respond to MIDRANGE-L Al Barsa writes: > IBM is at the highest tax rate. > > Advertising the 400 would increase their profits, and consequently the > amount of tax they had to pay. This might be a spoof comment. However there is the topic of marginal rate on advertising. I have to work harder to get that extra buck because more bucks means more taxes, so at some point the extra work isnt worth the extra money. Also how much market share will grab the attention of the Justice Department. We might argue that the Anti-Trust Division should be reviewing Microsoft & was right to go after IBM 1/2 a century ago, but from the perspective of the company at risk of such review, one might not trust the Justice Department to weild Justice, so one might go after market share just below the threshhold of Justice Dept interest. MacWheel99@aol.com (Alister Wm Macintyre) (Al Mac) +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +--- +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.