|
My original numbers were from the model 170. Why it performed so poorly is a good question, but not one I can answer, since it's no longer in my posession. The new numbers, much closer to what you expected, Nathan, come from the model 270. I'm hoping that WebSphere 3.0 will reduce my Java numbers, but I doubt they'll be reduced a factor of 10. Joe ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: "Nathan M. Andelin" <nathanma@haaga.com> Reply-To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 11:28:27 -0600 >I think the 3-1 ration was a mistake, Jon. I think the correct ratio was 30-1. On a 460 CPW machine, it shouldn't be taking 25msec to read 20 records from a file, build a subfile, then display the result on a 5250 device. For example, it takes my 300 Mhz Celeron PC only 4msec to read 51 records from a database table and copy them to another table. If I correctly follow Joe Pluta's later comments, his earlier 5250 estimate was too high. Nathan. +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.