Re: re[2]: finished goods

I concur, with the item type logic and pulling FG by class, etc.
  However, the big difference, concern  is going to be in Planning, if
you run mrp.  You'll want to set up the item as a 'P' , purchased in
Itembl for the purch site. and 'M' mfg in itembl for make site. you'll
have to somehow get the reqmnts to jump over from the purch env. to the
mfg env. maybe look into multi site logictics for some support. You would
then open a PO and CO / MO.  you may also want to set up a shipping and
recv Location for those items in transit.

hope this helps

Jeff Snyder CPIM

mapics consultant

-----Original Message-----
From: Lisa Weaver <lweaver@guidetechnologies.com>
To: mapics discussion board <mapics-l@midrange.com>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 16:11:07 -0500
Subject: re[2]: finished goods

> It really makes no difference what the item type is.  A manufactured
> part can be purchased and vice versa.  The standard can be keyed into
> the itemasb and the CTC left blank.  Since they are in different
> environments, it would make more sense to show the purchased part as an
> item type 4.  Remember, you have many different class code categories
> at your disposal (like item accounting class, item sales class), and
> you might use one of them in both environments to identify finished
> goods.
>
> Lisa Cohen Weaver
> Guide Technologies
>
> >
> Hi Bill!
> I do not know if I understood correctly neither which applications you
> have in
> MAPICS but maybe if you define a  relationship on your manufacturing
> division
> environment (let's call it MM) like:
>
> Finished Good Item - ABC
> Sales Customer 123 (your purchasing division)
> Sales Customer Item - DEF
>
> 1st Scene: You can define a Xref between the FG and how "the customer"
> is
> ordering the FG (which in this case it will be DEF).  At the time you
> ship the
> FG, you will be shipping ABC (this is on MM).  On the reports and
> invoices will
> appear the item 123 (maybe, I can't recall very well, guys correct me
> if I am
> wrong please).
>
> 2nd Scene: On the other side, let's say that your purchasing division
> environment is called MP.  In there, you could set also a relationship
> and say:
> my vendor item number is 123 but after receiving the material to stock,
> do a
> transfer to the FG ABC.
>
> For the first scene, in MM, you can use the Customer Item Number
> Cross-Reference
> File in COM.
>
> I do not know if I add more confusion than light here but at least my
> intention
> is to help.
>
> PALL Corporation
> Peter Vidal
> Senior System Analyst
>
>
>
>                     "Bill Mongan"
>                     <bmongan@generac.        To:
> <mapics-l@midrange.com>
>                     com>                     cc:
>                     Sent by:                 Subject:     finished
> goods
>                     mapics-l-admin@mi
>                     drange.com
>
>
>                     05/01/2002 04:25
>                     PM
>                     Please respond to
>                     mapics-l
>
>
>
>
>
>
> We are in the planning stages of separating 2 business units
> (divisions)
> into 2 separate MAPICs environments, which are currently operating in
> one
> environment. My question has to do with finished goods that one
> division
> purchases from another for sale to their customers. Today, in one
> environment, there is one item master, which is an item type 1 =
> finished
> goods, and has the bill of material and routing. Once we split, the
> bill of
> material and routing will only be maintained in the manufacturing
> division.
> We are struggling with what to do with the item in the purchasing
> division.
> They want to make it a purchased part, item type 4 or 9. But them how
> do I
> recognize and treat it as a finished good in their division, since it
> won't
> be an item type 1??  I still want to classify it as a finished good,
> since
> it is for sale to the end customer.    It does not look like I can
> still
> keep it an item type 1 without a bill of material or routing, since I
> can't
> then load a cost.   Any thoughts??
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bill Mongan, CPA
> Cost Accounting Manager
> Generac Power Systems, Inc.
> (262) 544-4811 x2097
> bmongan@generac.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MAPICS-L@midrange.com
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/mapics-l
> or email: MAPICS-L-request@midrange.com
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MAPICS-L@midrange.com
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/mapics-l
> or email: MAPICS-L-request@midrange.com
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.
>
>
>  <
> _______________________________________________
> This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MAPICS-L@midrange.com
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/mapics-l
> or email: MAPICS-L-request@midrange.com
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.
>
>