I've had issues before with authorization lists with CGI. I can't find the PMR I had with IBM, but I remember that there was unexpected behavior when combing the two.




-----Original Message-----
From: Rich Loeber [mailto:rich@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2020 7:18 AM
To: Web Enabling the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) <web400@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [WEB400] Problem with CGI from Browser (Resolved)

After additional testing with this customer, we were able to confirm that this was, in fact, a security problem.  The joblog was throwing an
MCH1001 on access to the application library specified as the CGI library.  The solution was to grant access to QTMHHTP1 at the library level, but this raises a question.  The library is secured with an authorization list and the QTMHHTP1 user profile (along with QTMHHTTP) is granted *ALL access in that authorization list.  Why was that not sufficient?

Rich Loeber - @richloeber
Kisco Information Systems
http://www.kisco.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2022 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.