× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



If the MariaDb database is working fine I would not suggest moving it in to DB2 storage engine unless you want to use the same data from an RPG application.

I can't imagine the performance would really be noticed on a small site unless you just want to do it as a technical exercise.

I haven't run in to any customers using the native DB2 engine and don't know how much if any effort is still going in to it.

Regards,
Richard Schoen
Web: http://www.richardschoen.net
Email: richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------

message: 6
date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 08:10:25 -0600
from: <midrangel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
subject: Re: [WEB400] Maria vs. DB2 performance on IBM i

Yes default, which I believe is innodb.

--
Jim Oberholtzer
Agile Technology Architects

-----Original Message-----
From: WEB400 <web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Nathan Andelin
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2020 11:52 AM
To: Web Enabling the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) <web400@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [WEB400] Maria vs. DB2 performance on IBM i

I've never heard of a "native" storage engine for MariaDB. Do you mean the "default" storage engine, which is supposedly https://mariadb.com/kb/en/innodb/? Actually, I'm not sure what the default storage engine is for PHP on IBM i. The phpMyAdmin dialog for creating tables has a drop-down list of about eight possible storage engine options.



On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 10:36 AM <midrangel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The native Maria storage engine, but your intuition question is
exactly what I'm asking. Yes, I would ordinarily agree with you but,
is it worth the extra work to move the data?

--
Jim Oberholtzer
Agile Technology Architects

-----Original Message-----
From: WEB400 <web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Nathan
Andelin
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2020 11:20 AM
To: Web Enabling the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries)
<web400@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: Re: [WEB400] Maria vs. DB2 performance on IBM i

On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 8:50 AM <midrangel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I am trying to decide with a newer web site if it's worth moving the
data into DB2 vs. leaving it in Maria.


When you say "leaving it in Maria", what storage engine are you
referring to (i.e. MyISAM, InnoDB, CSV)? My intuition says that using
the IBMDB2i storage engine would perform better than a storage engine
that referenced a bulk IFS file. But I haven't seen any benchmarks to
prove it.
--

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.