|
The native Maria storage engine, but your intuition question is
exactly what I'm asking. Yes, I would ordinarily agree with you but,
is it worth the extra work to move the data?
--
Jim Oberholtzer
Agile Technology Architects
-----Original Message-----
From: WEB400 <web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Nathan
Andelin
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2020 11:20 AM
To: Web Enabling the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries)
<web400@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [WEB400] Maria vs. DB2 performance on IBM i
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 8:50 AM <midrangel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I am trying to decide with a newer web site if it's worth moving the
data into DB2 vs. leaving it in Maria.
When you say "leaving it in Maria", what storage engine are you
referring to (i.e. MyISAM, InnoDB, CSV)? My intuition says that using
the IBMDB2i storage engine would perform better than a storage engine
that referenced a bulk IFS file. But I haven't seen any benchmarks to
prove it.
--
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.