|
Otherwise async is a pretty cool feature for other things, but noteverything.
but when IBM switched to async and stopped updating or supporting thesync db functions I think it's a mistake.
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 7:24 PM, Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
DB
I'm curious too. Particularly if the "batch script" were performing any
I/O. Why would you do that in Node.js?
I'm in the same camp here with async operations for most DB, especially
retrieving data. I hear the argument "but your program can go and do this
and that while the result set is being retrieved". That's the whole
point.. I need that result set before I can continue on! :)
Updating, inserting and deleting for the most part can be anynch, but when
IBM switched to async and stopped updating or supporting the sync db
functions I think it's a mistake. Especially if you're doing business
programming.
Otherwise async is a pretty cool feature for other things, but not
everything.
--
This is the Web Enabling the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (WEB400) mailing
list
To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400
or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/web400.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.