Re: Single Page Applications

[Jon Paris <jon.paris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

" Is that a feature-rich UI?” 

In my opinion it is classic case of overkill. I get so sick of cutesy poo applications.

I’m not a green screen advocate - but I don't believe that just because you _can_ do is not a good reason _to_ do it!


Jon Paris

www.partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com

On Jun 18, 2015, at 1:16 PM, Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Kevin,
>
> Something Joe Pluta used to say has stuck with me. Speaking in the context
> of frameworks, particularly Java-based, he would note differences between
> programmers who were "class builders" vs. others who might be "class
> consumers". Some may be framework builders while others may be application
> builders.
>
> Lately, I have had an interest in "single page applications" and
> "responsive UI design". I have been reviewing those kinds of frameworks. My
> biggest gripe is that every client-side framework I have ever become
> acquainted with was overly-scoped IMHO.
>
> What is a feature-rich UI? Is that different from a feature-rich
> application? Included in Polymer is a checkbox input element which displays
> a little animation effect when clicked. Is that a feature-rich UI?
> -- 
> This is the Web Enabling the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (WEB400) mailing list
> To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400
> or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/web400.