|
On 2012-08-10, at 1:00 PM, web400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
The limitation you're talking about isn't actually from JT400. It's aserver-side limitation from the Remote Command host server. If you look at
the native cwb_* APIs for IBM i Access, you'll see they have the same
foibles. So, the target of disappointment/jabs/anger/whatnot should be
that server interface.
Yep - I understand that. It is just simpler to talk about it in terms of
jt400.
I like the concept of XMLSERVICE as a community-based replacement forthe Remote Command server, but wish it would have reused the PCML/XPCML
format for that part of its functionality ... although I guess that could
be added. In an ideal world, adopting the standard format would allow IBM
to update the baked-in PCML support in the RPG compiler.
Agreed. And adding these kinds of interfaces is exactly what Tony was
hoping for. As another example, JSON would be really nice - hint hint if
you are reading this (you know who you are).
Jon Paris
www.partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com
--
This is the Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries (WEB400) mailing list
To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400
or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/web400.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.