Re: Getting a pulse for Ruby On Rails on i

[Pete Helgren <pete@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Well, using jRuby and JDBC to connect is "native" enough for me and 
easily keeps up with the Rails community changes.  It is also the 
fastest MRI implementation since it will compile down to machine code 
with JIT compiling (as far as I understand Java on i).

Plenty of comparisons of JRuby and MRI on the web but here is recent one:
http://cscarioni.blogspot.com/2012/06/simple-mri-ruby-v-jruby-performance.html

And another recent article with mention of AOT:
http://www.infoq.com/articles/state-of-jruby

The guys developing JRuby continue to improve the performance and 
implement the latest Java technologies with backward compatibility.  I 
like that combination and the flexibility that using JRuby gives me with 
using existing jar's and other Java code.

Pete Helgren
Value Added Software, Inc
www.petesworkshop.com
GIAC Secure Software Programmer-Java

On 8/1/2012 10:47 AM, Aaron Bartell wrote:
> Not sure on that point, though it is something I am going to find out and
> will document back to the group.
>
> My hope/goal is to get RoR completely setup on IBMi in PASE, connected
> "natively" to DB2 and available through an SSH session (by-passing 5250).
>   I am basically trying to see if IBMi could be used as a RoR server with
> very little massaging so new releases of Ruby/Rails/Rake/etc could be
> adopted at the same rate as other platforms.
>
> I found this article from Scott Klement that I believe will get me right
> into qp2term without going to the 5250 telnet command line first: *
> http://bit.ly/R8d3fW  *
>
> Aaron Bartell
> www.MowYourLawn.com/blog
> www.OpenRPGUI.com
> www.SoftwareSavesLives.com