× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



For PHP it would be the same. Just fire up another Apache instance on a
different port. Nothing special there.

Brian May
Project Lead
Management Information Systems
Garan, Incorporated
Starkville, Mississippi



Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
10/07/2010 01:11 PM
Please respond to
Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries <web400@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


To
Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries <web400@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc

Subject
Re: [WEB400] Which scales better? J2EE, PHP, or CGIDEV2?






Regarding routing requests from one Apache instance to another, that
reminds me
of how PHP worked under IBM i originally. Nobody like that. But
regarding
running multiple independent Apache instances, folks might do that to host

different versions of their software in separate libraries and use an
Apache
instance to point to each. That seems like a valid requirement. Also, if

you're providing Cloud services to the States of New York and Montana, you
might
configure a couple Apache instances accordingly. New York uses one
instance,
Montana uses the other.

What would it take to separate software versions or separate cloud
customers
under JEE and PHP?

-Nathan



----- Original Message ----
From: Aaron Bartell <aaronbartell@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries <web400@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thu, October 7, 2010 11:48:27 AM
Subject: Re: [WEB400] Which scales better? J2EE, PHP, or CGIDEV2?

So in theory I could have a "main router" Apache instance that
received in the TLD request (i.e. mowyourlawn.com/pgmname) and then
forwarded that request off to another Apache server instance that
operated on a different port and all subsequent request would go to
that instance of Apache? I guess it might be better to have a network
appliance accomplish this task instead of doing it in an RPG program -
though it would be nice to have the control entirely on the IBMi.

Or in short, does your statement mean I could have 10 Apache instances
for a total possibility of 99,990 concurrent threads/jobs?

Aaron Bartell
http://mowyourlawn.com
http://mowyourlawn.com/blog/




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.