Re: Which scales better? J2EE, PHP, or CGIDEV2?

It also depends on what you are trying to scale, the front office (UI) or the back office (inventory, sales...)

Duane Christen




--


Duane Christen
Senior Software Engineer
(319) 790-7162
Duane.Christen@xxxxxxxxxx

Visit PAETEC.COM


-----Original Message-----
From: web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kevin Schroeder
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 3:38 PM
To: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries
Subject: Re: [WEB400] Which scales better? J2EE, PHP, or CGIDEV2?

... and running "Hello, World"

Kevin Schroeder
Technology Evangelist
Zend Technologies, Ltd.
www.zend.com
www.twitter.com/kpschrade
www.eschrade.com

-----Original Message-----
From: web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Henrik Rützou
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 3:31 PM
To: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries
Subject: Re: [WEB400] Which scales better? J2EE, PHP, or CGIDEV2?

Aaron,

as long as you keep scalability within a 128 concurrent RISC processors range and one DB, I dont think you have a scalability problem

/Henrik

On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Aaron Bartell <aaronbartell@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:

What's interesting to me is that it almost seems that scalability has
nothing to do with how well something performs but rather how well it
can progress to use more resources! LOL!

So if RPG output a string of "HelloWorld" in 1 msecond and Java did it
in 2 mseconds, we aren't necessarily considering that RPG is more
scalable - just that it can accomplish a particular task faster.
Though that may mean the point in time we need to scale is later using
RPG and sooner with Java - so in a way the language (or rather the
language runtime) *could* be a scalability issue.

Thoughts?
Aaron Bartell
http://mowyourlawn.com
http://mowyourlawn.com/blog/



On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

From: Aaron Bartell
Maybe we should define scalability.

The Wikipedia definition works for me. "scalability is a desirable

property of a

system, a network, or a process, which indicates its ability to
either

handle

growing amounts of work in a graceful manner or to be enlarged."

Under that definition CGIDEV2 would scale well just by running under
IBM

i where

available resources (processors, memory, etc.) are automatically

allocated to

separate jobs. No need to configure anything, except standard HTTP

server

configuration directives allowing a given number of threads and CGI

server jobs,

timeouts, and so forth. Native workloads automatically scale to use

available

resources.

Is the same true for J2EE and PHP?

-Nathan.

--
This is the Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries (WEB400) mailing list To
post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe,
or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400
or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/web400.

--
This is the Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries (WEB400) mailing list To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400
or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/web400.

--
This is the Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries (WEB400) mailing list To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400
or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/web400.