One thing that motivated me to download pd4ml was a performance benchmark, published on their web site, which indicated much higher throughput than that of my testing with Aaron Bartell's HTML2PDF4i utility. My original thought was that a performance advantage alone might justify the additional cost of a pd4ml license. However, both utilities appear to offer identical performance in generating an identical 150 page PDF document on my server.

That may not be saying much. It takes 2 minutes to generate that PDF on my server. To be honest, that kind of performance is a bit repulsive to me. I've done a number of performance tests, and I think these Java jars may be a case where my 1 Gig of RAM, is insufficient.

Performance may be a moot point, however. PDF reports are a requirement!

Any thoughts about performance?

-Nathan.





As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2022 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.