×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Thanks for the reply. And please forgive my ignorance. Couldn't a
reference to the result set be passed just as easily? I really don't know.
Actually, that is a very good question and my response is going to be based
on my experiences and not necessarily the "real reason" if there is such a
thing. I don't pass SQL result sets because they aren't part of the Java
Collection hierarchy. What that basically equates to is that I can't easily
use SQL result sets with other frameworks like the JSF dataTable. You could
think of converting an SQL result set to a Collection with POJO's as entries
as a way to genericise the result. I will conclude with the fact that you
will most definitely lose CPU cycles in the process (not a fact I like).
Can anybody add to my statement (either in correction or support)?
Aaron Bartell
http://mowyourlawn.com
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
