× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



We should start a site named www.myspaceII.com and have it running RPG CGI
on an i5 :-) We would build a better interface (which wouldn't take much).
Then once it starts to catch on we would ask IBM to give us a big ol' 595
and open it wide open to see how well it could handle the workload of
260,000 new users a day. Man that would be a fun project to work on!

Elaine Lennox would be the person to talk to as it sounds like she isn't
opposed to alternative ways to market (i.e. most recent i5 youtube.com
videos).


The biggest constraint now appears to be the time it takes to maintain
applications across thousands of servers.

I have used MySpace.com on a very limited basis, but I just don't see how
the core software could be more than a couple 100k lines of code. Not like
it has thousands of pages with thousands of unique fields (say data) to
maintain. I know I must be over simplifying it, but it just doesn't feel
that complicated on the web frontend programming.

Aaron Bartell
http://mowyourlawn.com


-----Original Message-----
From: web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Nathan Andelin
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 9:41 AM
To: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries
Subject: Re: [WEB400]
Recommendationsofwebdevelopmentarchitecture/toolfordiverse i5 access...

Aaron B. wrote: So I am wondering how many servers they have running
all of those sites?

They said they were running about 3,000 servers. At first they tried
scaling vertically, using 16-way servers, but when that didn't work, they
went with horizontal scaling. The database server was a constraint, so they
partitioned the database across 60 DB servers.

The biggest constraint now appears to be the time it takes to maintain
applications across thousands of servers.

What I more want to know, and am guessing nobody here can really
answer, is how much work (hardware, software, etc) is required to do >this
with M$ vs. IBM?

Good question. The i5 would scale better vertically, up to 64-way servers,
but at some point you'd need an architecture that scaled horizontally.

Interesting the MySpace.com guy said that he can't imagine doing this
on any other platform than Microsoft ...

He also said they pulled their hair out every night.

Nathan.




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.