|
Just be careful when you start going to the "brave new world" of web design. I always mention this particular topic up when I speak about web design: there is a religious war out there about "Tables" vs. "No Tables", and it really is purely a philosophical issue. Using DIVs is particularly graceful in online magazines and blogs where long sections of text need to be nicely formatted regardless of the browser size. Tables, on the other hand, tend to force the browser into a fairly specific layout, but that's typically okay with most business users; they LIKE knowing where the A/R aging information is on the customer screen. So, tables are nearly always fine for business uses, and as you are finding, they're probably easier to use and definitely more likely to be consistent across browsers. The DIV technique is very nice when you want a "glossy" presentation, but it takes more work and, in my experience, a little more know-how than I have the time to invest. I'm willing to bet that, if you learn the DIV technique really well and decide it's the best way to go, that you won't have a ton of trouble reworking your tables into DIVs later. And until then, KISS reigns supreme <grin>. Joe
From: Mike I guess I am just trying to learn "Web 2.0"... but probably biting off more than I can chew. Eh... I will move that table to a table. I KNOW how to work with those.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.