|
But the question then arises, why not just have GeneXus go to machine
code instead of an intermediate language? Because: A) Then you'd have to do an enormous amount of work to port to another platform. While the amount of work needed is still significant, the basic Java/COBOL/C/C++ generated would be the same. So you are much better off letting the compiler worry about the machine level. In fact, as you know if you think about it, the RPG complier doesn't even generate machine code for the exact same reason. It generates the generic W-code so IBM only need a single "compiler" (i.e. the translator) to turn it into machine language. B) It's hard to do. The old RPG compiler generated MI (again not really machine code) and even with the help of macros to assist in code gen it is not an easy task. I've not experienced using Genexus myself - but those I've talked to who used it were very happy with the results. Just like with Synon and other similar products like ProGen - you're not supposed to look at the code it generates so who cares what it looks like. Jon Paris Partner400 www.Partner400.com www.RPGWorld.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.