>Poor job IBM - If you can produce a native version of Apache - how hard
was it to do the same for PHP?

This one made me think. . . Would they have to create a custom "IBM PHP"
runtime similar to what they did with Tomcat? If so that would truly be a
bummer because that would mean the future versions of PHP would have to go
through the hands of IBM before it made its way to us.

I am not real familiar with the PASE environment, but what makes it require
two versions of Apache to be running? Is PASE almost like a different LPAR
and acts as it's own OS?  Is it more that putting RPG CGI and PHP in the
same Apache config would create a mess or is it not possible to have them
both in the same config because they can't both see the same config?

Aaron Bartell

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2020 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].