This one's easy for me. I wish IBM would stick millions more into getting people to try Websfear. It's my best seller for my eRPG books, my eRPG SDK, and consulting. Even if I do it for free, I love it. Why? They spend years on websphere, can't get it to work and/or realize their hardware is undersized and look for other solutions. I get this type of email at LEAST once a week... "Brad, we tried websphere, etc.. etc... tell me about eRPG.. we've not approached it but after websphere, we're open to anything..." I point them to my eRPG SDK or CGIDEV2 and in 15 minutes they're up and running and say "geesh.... wish I knew about this 4 years ago!" So I say, advertise on! :) Brad www.bvstools.com On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 18:06:04 -0500 "Jon Paris" <Jon.Paris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > IBM's "WebSphere or nothing" approach and suggesting that > more people would > update more applications if IBM would support CGI > (CGIDEV2 and other > options) within the tools to give people a lower cost of > entry to the web > world. > > As part of the piece I'd like to include some specific, > and preferably > practical, suggestions as to enhancements that IBM could > make. > > Any suggestions? > > Jon Paris > Partner400 > www.Partner400.com > > _______________________________________________ > This is the Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries (WEB400) > mailing list > To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400 > or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Before posting, please take a moment to review the > archives > at http://archive.midrange.com/web400. > Bradley V. Stone BVS.Tools www.bvstools.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.