RE: Re: FRCA-Fast Response Cache Accelerator any benefit while running CGI apps?

>Mozilla, however, forces a reload. 

A refresh request from Mozilla forces FRCA to invalidate its cache?
Doesn't sound right. 

-Walden


------------
Walden H Leverich III
President & CEO
Tech Software
(516) 627-3800 x11
WaldenL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.TechSoftInc.com 

Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
(Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.)
 
-----Original Message-----
From: web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Wayne McAlpine
Sent: Wednesday, 27 October, 2004 15:15
To: web400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [WEB400] Re: FRCA-Fast Response Cache Accelerator any benefit
while running CGI apps?

I have been using FRCA reverse proxy cache for the past year with cgi 
programs to serve election night results real-time.  I've got it set to 
cache for three mminutes, so the first call to a particular page loads 
it into the cache.  Subsequent calls during the next three minutes 
receive the cached copy.  There are literally thousands of pages cached 
in a large election and this works extremely well.

Prior to using the cache, each request did a cgi database read and buidl

of an html page, with a resulting high processor and disk usage.  We did

some stress testing originally and found a tremendous performance 
improvement using the cache, while keeping cpu usage within acceptable 
levels.  The real test will be next Tuesday night when the polls close. 
    Wish me luck!

BTW, the IE browser refresh button retrieves the cached copy.  Mozilla, 
however, forces a reload.  Fortunately, about 98% of our clients are IE,

so it works fine.



Mike Skvarenina wrote:
> My apologies for the continuous questions but now that I'm running
Apache, I
> feel like a kid in a candy store and am looking to maximize my CGI
> performance.  The documentation is useful but end user experience is
almost
> always much more informative.
> 
> This question is about the FRCA.  My CGI apps are basically RPG
database
> intensive programs that don't make much use of the IFS.  About the
only IFS
> references I use is for the graphics (icons and pictures) I store on
the IFS
> so my CGI apps can reference them.
> 
> In this case, does using FRCA add any benefit?
> 
> 
> Also, I see there are options to specify the min and max number of CGI
jobs.
> The default is 40.  I cannot find any documentation on recommended
values
> based on my system size.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries (WEB400) mailing list
> To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400
> or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/web400.
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
This is the Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries (WEB400) mailing list
To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400
or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/web400.