|
I am looking for some feedback on folks who have chosen to Web-enable their green screen environments...a feature that IBM has conveniently created huge purchase bargains for and a feature that promises some very interesting options for the 400 environment. The following are some specifics I would love to get some discussion going on: I have heard that the web-facing procedures effectively run as "batch jobs" in the operating system and that IBM sells you only the "governed" CPW machines, effectively shutting down most/all of the interactive feature? Is this true? What specific effects does this have on typical interactive programs that handle data entry or inquiry? What about heavy transactional apps like Warehouse Management...through an RF device? If I ran an old fashioned 5250 program and did not send it through the "converter", would the job crawl slower than a turtle on valium? What about performance in general? Are HTML pages through web browser portals less stable than the good old dumb terminal or is there no real difference? What about a simple thing like your sign-on to qinter in the morning? Are you visible running out of qinter? Are any jobs running out of qinter if they are web-faced? What about printkeys? How do the "green screens" look appearance wise if you are only converting them, not modifying them? Anything you can think of would be very helpful to us in making this tough decision to convert to a web-sphere operation. Thanks much. Rick Rayburn NYC
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.