× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 15:44:18 -0500 
 "Bartell, Aaron L. (TC)" <ALBartell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The nice thing about Apache is that it decodes the
> content of the post back
> to normal, meaning it takes out all encodings like %20.
>  With Classic you
> have to decode it manually, unless there is a setting I
> have missed.  I like
> Classic better than Apache except for above reason.

Almost forget about this one,

Yes, classic does.  I guess I've never run across that
problem.. you must be trying to cheat or something with
your programs.  Ha..

Nope, I haven't one ONE single advantage to Apache over
classic.  Well, the information for Apache is everywhere,
but it doesn't really always apply to the iseries version
of the server either (ie configuring CGI for example...)
 Oh, and I guess IBM dropping Classic for Apache is another
advantage, however forced it is.

Brad
 


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.