|
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 15:44:18 -0500 "Bartell, Aaron L. (TC)" <ALBartell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The nice thing about Apache is that it decodes the > content of the post back > to normal, meaning it takes out all encodings like %20. > With Classic you > have to decode it manually, unless there is a setting I > have missed. I like > Classic better than Apache except for above reason. Almost forget about this one, Yes, classic does. I guess I've never run across that problem.. you must be trying to cheat or something with your programs. Ha.. Nope, I haven't one ONE single advantage to Apache over classic. Well, the information for Apache is everywhere, but it doesn't really always apply to the iseries version of the server either (ie configuring CGI for example...) Oh, and I guess IBM dropping Classic for Apache is another advantage, however forced it is. Brad
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.