|
> The NetScape comparison is flawed for a lot of reasons: But it's easy to comprehend, and management tend to latch onto things like this. Alas! > I can sympathise with the attitude "if it ain't broke, don't fix > it". But at some point, any company may still come up against a > competitor employing a different methodology, developing a product > from scratch, that may well blow away yours. At some point, your > code base may well be too brittle to easily respond to changing > market conditions, where the easier response it to start from > scratch. I suspect there's already an awful lot of RPG code in that > particular boat, and the need to add a "webified" interface > certainly isn't helping any. All true. But I've spent my life branded as a 'blue sky techie who has no head for the business end of things.' I feel this is patently false but when such a moniker is applied, it isn't easy to shake. The upshot is that when I (literally the most experienced person in the company) bring up the idea of re-writing a _portion_ of our code base, (brittle is a fair description of the oldest code) the thought is poo-poohed away by the 'business heads.' A common rejoinder is that our competitors haven't had to go that route, so why should we (and fall behind?) The worst part is that several ex-competitors are now gone because they did just that: re-wrote, lost market share during the re-write period, and now they're 'unknown' with a new product (read: untested.) Nobody wants to take a flyer on this entirely new software until they've seen it installed somewhere else. Nasty. > My point is that a paradigm change may well be necessary for many > shops. "Webifying" a tradional green-screen app (using whatever > tool) may well give it a few more years of life. But in my (perhaps > jaded and cynical) opinion, it's only delaying the inevitable. Yes, but we really do need the time (instant GUI) in order to simply market what we have in order to survive. Without marketing now, we will not get paid tomorrow, and new development will... well, cease. It's like being balanced on a knife edge. How much do you put back in the business as R&D, and how much to maintain what's already there? That's really what we're talking about. Good thread. --buck
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.