|
> From: Eyers, Daniel You make great points, Dan, but we disagree in one place: > You own the content, > I own the machine and window. When you take control of the window, you > break that agreement. Change my home page or > stuff like that, and we're not going to use your site. You lose because > either 1) I don't use the site, increasing your > transactional costs or 2) I find another vendor that I will give me what I > want. I don't agree that you "own the window". If you're talking to my application, then at that point I own the window. Now, I agree that making permanent changes to your browser environment is very uncool, but if the change is only in place during the life of the transaction, then it's perfectly acceptable. That's my opinion. You use my application, use it like it was intended. If I have more control over the window, then that gives me more flexibility in making the application robust, rather than having to worry about every weird possibility you as a user might dream up. As always, it comes down to my mantra: it's a business decision. Joe
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.