|
No. On both SQL statements, try using an Order By which corresponds to an existing key (e.g. Order by fields1) and see if it makes any difference. HTH Paul Tuohy ----- Original Message ----- From: "Patrick Goovaerts" <pgoovaerts@xxxxxxxxxx> To: <java400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: <web400@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2003 8:07 PM Subject: [WEB400] SQL problem. > For our webapps we use sql statements to retrieve data from our iSeries. I > used to use the * to retrieve all fields for a record. Thinking this over, > I realized that I regularly need only half of the fields in the database. > Because our records has mostly between 20 and 50 fields, this could be a > huge datatraffic overhead. > Therefore I tested retrieval of data using SQL as follows: > SQL1= 'select * from dbfile where field1=string' > SQL2= 'select field1, field10, field 17 from dbfile where field1=string' > > surprisingly SQL2 is running slower than SQL1! I think this has something > to do with the creation of a new temporary table with only 3 fields by the > SQL-engine, no?
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.