× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



For our webapps we use sql statements to retrieve data from our iSeries.  I
used to use the * to retrieve all fields for a record.  Thinking this over,
I realized that I regularly need only half of the fields in the database.
Because our records has mostly between 20 and 50 fields, this could be a
huge datatraffic overhead.
Therefore I tested retrieval of data using SQL as follows:
SQL1= 'select * from dbfile where field1=string'
SQL2= 'select field1, field10, field 17 from dbfile where field1=string'

surprisingly SQL2 is running slower than SQL1!  I think this has something
to do with the creation of a new temporary table with only 3 fields by the
SQL-engine, no?




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.