|
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] I see your point, and I do agree with it... I guess what I was trying to make sure of is this... Did IBM engineer any AS/400 Specific Capabilities into the WebSphere product, that TomCat wouldn't be able to duplicate since it was written for a broader hardware base... tim > -----Original Message----- > From: David Morris [SMTP:David.Morris@plumcreek.com] > Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 9:36 AM > To: web400@midrange.com > Subject: RE: [WEB400] New System Development Tomcat Tuning > > Tim, > > By using the 1.3 JDK and playing around with the memory allocated to > the JVM and garbage collection, I bet Joe could have improved on this. > > > Because Tomcat is the reference platform for the JSP and Servlet > specifications, the question is backwards. It should be "Is there > anything > that WebSphere can't do that Tomcat does?" The answer is that > WebSphere does not follow the standards exactly, which may cause > problems with some servlets. Tomcat 4.0 is also based on the Servlet > 2.3 specification with adds filters, which are very important and will > > likely change the way people write servlets. Filters allow you to pipe > > output from one process to another. For example, you might generate > an XML document and then use a filter to transform that to HTML. > > Tomcat cannot run EJBs without some other help like JBOSS or Enhydra. > I really don't know why someone would want to use EJBs unless you have > > a highly distributed application model. There are lightweight > persistence > mechanisms available that are simpler and fit between full blown EJBs > and naked servlets that can help with the database persistence that > are worth looking at if you really think you need EJBs. > > David Morris > > >>> thatzenbeler@clinitech.net 05/13/02 10:10AM >>> > This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not > understand > this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. > -- > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] > Thanks running the tests... It's nice to know, that Tomcat can run at > the > same speeds... > > So with that being said, is their any functionality difference between > Tomcat and the standard WebSphere? > > Is there anything Tomcat can't do, when it comes to running the web > apps? > > thanks, tim > _______________________________________________ > This is the Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries (WEB400) mailing list > To post a message email: WEB400@midrange.com > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/web400 > or email: WEB400-request@midrange.com > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives > at http://archive.midrange.com/web400. This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential or privileged information. Any unauthorized review; use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy the message.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.