×

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.




This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
I see your point, and I do agree with it...  I guess what I was trying to
make sure of is this...  Did IBM engineer any AS/400 Specific Capabilities
into the WebSphere product, that TomCat wouldn't be able to duplicate since
it was written for a broader hardware base...


tim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Morris [SMTP:David.Morris@plumcreek.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 9:36 AM
> To:   web400@midrange.com
> Subject:      RE: [WEB400] New System Development Tomcat Tuning
>
> Tim,
>
> By using the 1.3 JDK and playing around with the memory allocated to
> the JVM and garbage collection, I bet Joe could have improved on this.
>
>
> Because Tomcat is the reference platform for the JSP and Servlet
> specifications, the question is backwards. It should be "Is there
> anything
> that WebSphere can't do that Tomcat does?" The answer is that
> WebSphere does not follow the standards exactly, which may cause
> problems with some servlets. Tomcat 4.0 is also based on the Servlet
> 2.3 specification with adds filters, which are very important and will
>
> likely change the way people write servlets. Filters allow you to pipe
>
> output from one process to another. For example, you might generate
> an XML document and then use a filter to transform that to HTML.
>
> Tomcat cannot run EJBs without some other help like JBOSS or Enhydra.
> I really don't know why someone would want to use EJBs unless you have
>
> a highly distributed application model. There are lightweight
> persistence
> mechanisms available that are simpler and fit between full blown EJBs
> and naked servlets that can help with the database persistence that
> are worth looking at if you really think you need EJBs.
>
> David Morris
>
> >>> thatzenbeler@clinitech.net 05/13/02 10:10AM >>>
> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not
> understand
> this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
> --
> [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
> Thanks running the tests... It's nice to know, that Tomcat can run at
> the
> same speeds...
>
> So with that being said, is their any functionality difference between
> Tomcat and the standard WebSphere?
>
> Is there anything Tomcat can't do, when it comes to running the web
> apps?
>
> thanks, tim
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries (WEB400) mailing list
> To post a message email: WEB400@midrange.com
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/web400
> or email: WEB400-request@midrange.com
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/web400.
This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the
intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential or privileged
information.  Any unauthorized review; use, disclosure or distribution is
prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender by reply e-mail and destroy the message.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.