|
Michael, Java will have it's time, with or without Websphere. But right now, I don't feel it's ready to handle "everything". Joe's ideas about mixing RPG and Java are great, but I also think it's overkill for web apps. (don't shoot, it's my opinion, ok?) It also takes away from the "portability" of Java. I know Joe preaches his methods and doesn't like SQL for data access in Java, but I've found SQL to be very nice for data access, and very portable. Like i've said before, we started out hearing "use Java/Net.Data". Now we're hearing "Use Java/Net.Data for the front end, and RPG for the data access." I say, just use RPG for everything already. Then again, 2002 is coming, so a new language should be coming anytime to take over for Java. :) Brad On Tue, 7 Aug 2001 16:01:35 -0400 "Michael Skvarenina" <mskvarenina@usa.net> wrote: > Jon, can you comment on "Websphere....it has it's place"? > > In our shop we have a very robust but legacy system that > we want to > 'modernize' by moving as much functionality as possible > to the web. We've > done a little Net.data and now were doing some killer > stuff with CGIDEV2 but > long term RPG CGI programming doesn't sound like a > strategic direction > dispite it's outstanding performance on our box (we have > an 830-4way). > > RPG CGI so far has been great for us so far but I am sure > it has it's > limitations.....if anything it's teaching my RPG staff > HTML which they will > need to understand in the long run anyway. We've heard > of the Websphere > Java servlet / RPG backend model as Joe Pluta pushes in > his book > "E-deployemnt The Fastest Path to the Web" but we are > also wondering about > using straight Java all around. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <jon.paris@e400.com> > To: <WEB400@midrange.com> > Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 3:25 PM > Subject: RE: Mixing GET and POST Methods > > > > > > >> IMHO, the world is still big enough for both e-rpg > and CGIDEV2. > > > > Amen to that! > > > > >> It may even be big enough for Websphere too, but I > doubt I'll live > long > > enough to get the mother running! > > > > We're running three or four sites using it and although > it can be a pig to > > get up and running it has its place. It gets easier to > handle with each > > new release. > > > > > > +--- > > | This is the WEB400 Mailing List! > > | To submit a new message, send your mail to > WEB400@midrange.com. > > | To subscribe to this list send email to > WEB400-SUB@midrange.com. > > | To unsubscribe from this list send email to > WEB400-UNSUB@midrange.com. > > | Questions should be directed to the list > owner/operator: > david@midrange.com > > +--- > > > > > > > > +--- > | This is the WEB400 Mailing List! > | To submit a new message, send your mail to > WEB400@midrange.com. > | To subscribe to this list send email to > WEB400-SUB@midrange.com. > | To unsubscribe from this list send email to > WEB400-UNSUB@midrange.com. > | Questions should be directed to the list > owner/operator: david@midrange.com > +--- Bradley V. Stone BVS.Tools www.bvstools.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.