Re: Apache Server & CGI

We have been using it for a while on IGNITe/400 more playing
than anything. Especially when as we find out you put on
some PTF's, and it kills the server because of codepage
issues ;) 

Also the docs are not great and a lot of the functions dont
work yet but it has great potentail. Have a look on the
IGNITe/400 mailing list and forum, as we hope to be posting
more info soon (trying to get both a CGI from Brad and a
Net.Data macro to run right now), Bob Cancilla also did an
article at

http://www.ignite400.org/html/articles/art117.htm

The pros right now are it looks neat, the con is you cant
run a full blown site with it stay with the HTTP server for
now. You can have both running at the same time by the way
no problems.

Thanks Bleddyn



On Mon, 5 Feb 2001 21:37:41 -0500
 jpcarr@TREDEGAR.COM wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> This was a part of a news update I got from John
> Quarantello's mailing
> list.    I was interested in # 4 and #6.
> Has anyone started using the Apache server yet?    What
> version of OS/400
> is required?
> 
> How exactly does it help with "Secure Single signons"
> for CGI programs?
> and what does it do to help Persistent CGI sessions?
> 
> What other neat things (or more exactly)  what are the
> Pro's and Con's for
> the Apache vs the native HTTP server
> 

+---
| This is the WEB400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to WEB400@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to WEB400-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to WEB400-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---