Re: RDi 9.6 Procedure wizzard -- WDSCI-L

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: Re: RDi 9.6 Procedure wizzard
From: dlclark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 13:07:03 -0500
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l/>
List-help: <mailto:wdsci-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio Client for System i & iSeries <wdsci-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:wdsci-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l>, <mailto:wdsci-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/wdsci-l>, <mailto:wdsci-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

"WDSCI-L" <wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on 11/30/2017 12:50:27 PM:

It's a personal preference thing. I prefer separate header files to
compiler directives. I've used both schemes, and I find the header files
are simpler to manage.

On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Justin Taylor <JUSTIN@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

I agree. I don't see that header files for RPG add anything over

using

compiler directives to bring in your prototypes.

OK you guys... Enlighten me, please. I know what header files
are in the C sense, but I've never heard of header files for RPG. I only
know of /COPY and /INCLUDE. When were header files introduced for RPG and
how does that work?

Sincerely,

Dave Clark

Follow-Ups:

Re: RDi 9.6 Procedure wizzard , Charles Wilt
Re: RDi 9.6 Procedure wizzard , Justin Taylor

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.