Re: RDi 9.6 Procedure wizzard

It's a personal preference thing. I prefer separate header files to
compiler directives. I've used both schemes, and I find the header files
are simpler to manage.

On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Justin Taylor <JUSTIN@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

I agree. I don't see that header files for RPG add anything over using
compiler directives to bring in your prototypes.



-----Original Message-----
From: Darren Strong [mailto:darren@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 12:47 PM
To: Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio Client

for

System i & iSeries <wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] RDi 9.6 Procedure wizzard

Not seeing it on my end. I personally find compiler directives a better
way to bring in prototypes from the actual target program source, rather
than use /copy books to a source member with just a prototype in it, so I
initially ran to see IBM directing people to use one solution to a

problem

with multiple good solutions, but again, I'm not seeing it happen.



___________________________________
Darren Strong
Dekko


--
This is the Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio
Client for System i & iSeries (WDSCI-L) mailing list
To post a message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.

--
This is the Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio
Client for System i & iSeries (WDSCI-L) mailing list
To post a message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.