×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
I did the research of Subversive vs Subclipse about a week ago.
Subclipse is supported / developed by a group of people closely tied to Subversion. Development continues with it.
Subverse is supported / developed by a group of people related to Eclipse. Development stalled and/or in 'incubation'.
Good back and forth here:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/61320/what-are-the-pros-and-cons-of-the-svn-plugins-for-eclipse-subclipse-and-subvers
I decided to go with Subclipse.
As for Subversion vs Git. Researched this a couple of days ago. Just because Git is new kid on the block and in the news does not mean you should jump that way. There are pluses and minus to both. Also they are architected entirely different. Git is distributed, Subversion is centralized. I read someplace most enterprises will go Subversion because they need that centralized repository. We are currently using Subversion, but the software we use recommends Git. After this research, I think I will recommend staying with Subversion for now.
Thanks
Scott Johnson
-----Original Message-----
From: WDSCI-L [mailto:wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Edmund Reinhardt
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2017 8:14 PM
To: Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio Client for System i & iSeries <wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] SVN Synchronize action does not work from i Projects perspective
Hi Thomas,
Just curious why you would choose SVN over Git nowadays? Of course if that is what the organization has standardized and it is too much inertia to move, then I understand. EGit will work with RDi as well.
Edmund
midrange.com
