Re: i Project - urgent help requested

Well, the interesting part is that files from the associated library were
NOT cached, even though I explicitly used "Cache File Descriptions" on
them. Instead, files from libraries that were in RDi's library list are
cached. I'd test that theory, but our dev system is offline until tomorrow.

If true, should that be considered a bug?

- Dan

On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Jon Paris <jon.paris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Eric should be able to confirm this - but it may have to do with the
library associated with your project. You can only associate one library
(sadly) so it is possible that it can only see cached definitions for a
single library.

Just a thought,


Jon Paris

www.partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com

On Sep 25, 2017, at 4:05 PM, Dan <dan27649@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Eric Simpson <esimpson@xxxxxxxxxx>

wrote:

If you know your server is not available, you can right click on the

server

and select 'Work Offline'. After that, you should not be prompted to
connect.

Thank you, Eric.

After I did that, I opened the new source member with the two files
defined. The file definition from the "production" library appeared in

the

outline, but the file defined in my dev library (as described earlier)

did

not have the field definitions in the outline. I explicitly used "Cache
File Descriptions" on that file (and several others in my dev library),

but

I was unable to locate the databaseFieldListings2.cache files for these.
Is there a problem with using "Cache File Descriptions" to do this?

- Dan