×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
"WDSCI-L" <wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on 09/16/2016 01:03:52 PM:
Question, you do know you don’t have to use Binding Directories in
TurnOver as once you compile the program with the new module in your
Worklist library then TurnOver will manage the compile for you with
the correct list of modules/service programs. It is a pain to
manually compile and have to specify the correct list of modules, we
use a similar method but we have an interface for editing the list
of objects bound in.
If you're only using Binding Directories to manage modules then
that is probably mostly true -- unless you know something I don't. We
use TURNOVER but continue to have to use Binding Directories because we
ran into the problem of having too many bound modules for TURNOVER to
handle. So, at first we were just puting the surplus names in our Binding
Directory. But then we decided to just put them all in there and not have
to use such big create command overrides in TURNOVER anymore. On the flip
side, we also use many service programs and TURNOVER can't automatically
resolve service procedure calls to service programs. So, we have to use a
Binding Directory anyway.
Sincerely,
Dave Clark
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.