× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



I have a useability quesiton regarding the code coverage in RDi 9.5.0.3:

I tested this early on in the code coverage beta in a very narrow scope and am now trying to expand it to a larger scale. I have found documentation and tutorials online regarding the code coverage, how to initiate it and how to interpret the results, but I am confused on what the expectations are for how many test results are returned. Here is my scenario:

Generally I actually write another program to set up the test and then that will call the application that I wish to evaluate. In my earlier tests, this was always a 1:1, meaning that the "runner" application was called, it prepped the test, it called the code coverage application, and then it ended. This always worked as I expected it to. This is only a very narrow scope of what I normally do for testing. Generally the runner applications sets up all the test cases and calls the applications multiple times, once per test case. When I set up the code coverage, I use the runner application in the "how to start" tab of the code coverage configuration. When the application is called multiple times from the runner program, I get a varying amount of test reports returned. In one scenario, it calls the "runner" application once, and then executes 10 test cases against the code coverage application but only 4 coverage reports are returned to the workbench.

So my question is, in this scenario, should I be seeing 10 coverage reports, or is there something else that determines how these are compiled? The results in the 4 reports do not include code that I know ran and I'm wondering if this is in a report that is being left out somehow. If any of you know of deep dive documentation for code coverage that would go into this, I'd appreciate it.

Sam Hansen
This email message and any attached files contain information intended solely for the use of the individual(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged and/or confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, please (i) notify the sender, (ii) do not review, forward, copy or distribute this email or any attached files, and (iii) delete the original message.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.