Re: RDi 9.5 >Selected>Filter Selection. Needsa"Two-Stroke".

Mike,

It looks to me like that APAR covers the issue fine. I'll pass on opening
a PMR. (I've fallen further behind rather than catching up.)

I have noticed that it works sometimes when I'm in a second view, but it
is always a problem when in the primary view--that's not from thorough
testing, just my casual observation.

Thanks for locating this APAR. I'll use the link provided by Eric to
search for APARs. I've not been successful searching for them in the past.

Michael Quigley
Computer Services
The Way International
www.TheWay.org

"WDSCI-L" <wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on 11/11/2015 07:54:58 AM:

----- Message from "Mike Hockings" <hockings@xxxxxxxxxx> on Tue, 10
Nov 2015 18:55:30 -0500 -----

To:

Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio Client
for System i & iSeries <wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Subject:

Re: [WDSCI-L] RDi 9.5 >Selected>Filter Selection. Needsa"Two-Stroke".


Hi Michael,

This is the one that I was thinking of that I believe addresses the

issue

described in the WDSCI-L thread you linked to.

APAR SE63050 RDI 9.5.0 REMOTE SYSTEMS LPEX EDITOR USER MOUSE ACTIONS
REQUIRE AN EXTRA CLICK TO WORK

Mike Hockings, M.Eng., P.Eng.
IBM Rational Developer for System z and Power Systems Software Technical
Support
IBM Canada Ltd. Laboratory
hockings@xxxxxxxxxx





From: Mike Hockings/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
To: Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio
Client for System i & iSeries <wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2015-11-09 09:41
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] RDi 9.5 >Selected>Filter Selection. Needs
a"Two-Stroke".
Sent by: "WDSCI-L" <wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx>




Hi Michael,

There is at least this one
SE62904: RDI 9.5.0 LPEX FILTER BY DATE "EQUAL TO" FAILS TO REFRESH WHEN

THE

DATE IS NOT CHANGED
and the reason is the same. Basically after applying a filter the LPEX
view is not always being refreshed so the next action causes the refresh

to

happen.

I know that the issue has been discussed and the plan may be simply to
increase the scope of the existing APAR. I can't find a reference for

it

right now so if you are keen for a PMR to be sure that is fine.

Mike

Mike Hockings, M.Eng., P.Eng.
IBM Rational Developer for System z and Power Systems Software Technical
Support
IBM Canada Ltd. Laboratory
hockings@xxxxxxxxxx





From: MichaelQuigley@xxxxxxxxxx
To: wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: 2015-11-09 08:21
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] RDi 9.5 >Selected>Filter Selection. Needs
a "Two-Stroke".
Sent by: "WDSCI-L" <wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx>



This was brought up on the list in late September. Here's one message

from

one of the threads:
http://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l/201509/msg00239.html

I don't recall seeing anything specifically mentioning an APAR. A quick
scan of the weekly IBM Notifications I receive doesn't show anything.

*If*

I get time later today, I'll open a PMR and maybe that will allow an
actual APAR to be created--either that or I'll find out if there's

really

an APAR for it..

Although others have reported it is inconsistent, for me the problem is
consistent.

Michael Quigley
Computer Services
The Way International
www.TheWay.org