|
I can see where a UDO would be a descent work-around. Just tough after 15+ years of "25 <F13>"... I did lose some of those when we upgraded from an old 5.4 box to a new 7.1 box.
I just don't understand why RDi has to mess with the settings at all. In fact, I can recreate the scenario where it does NOT change the find parameters in PDM. If I'm actually in PDM on the green screen when I do a Text Search in RDi, nothing changes in PDM option 25.
So why not just "tell RDi" that the user profile is in PDM?
-----Original Message-----
From: WDSCI-L [mailto:wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Vernon Hamberg
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 2:44 PM
To: Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio Client for System i & iSeries
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] SEU Search options
Good point - the existence of this easily-obtained plug-in mitigates
against IBM making a change - and that's fine. They have to use limited
resources wisely, just as all the rest of us do.
Now Edmund, do NOT listen to me!! :)
Vern
On 3/4/2015 12:29 PM, Jon Paris wrote:
Slightly off kilter question.
Why with the advent of iSphere with its waaaaayyyyyy faster search speeds and more flexible options is anybody still using the built-in search? I have't used it once since I installed iSphere.
Jon Paris
www.partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com
On Mar 4, 2015, at 1:25 PM, Vernon Hamberg <vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ah I did miss that he said PDM - yes, doable, but I sometimes use the *CHG option, sometimes the *DSP, sometimes case-sensitive, sometimes not - I know I could prompt a user option, too, so maybe this would be enough of a workaround. We'll see if Greg thinks so.
I've no problem with leveraging something like FNDSTRPDM in RDi, just that it still would be good if it had no side-effect on my use of the command in PDM.
Later
Vern
On 3/4/2015 12:15 PM, John Yeung wrote:
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Vernon Hamberg <vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:--
[Re: Doug's suggestion of defining one's own PDM options]I can't be sure, but I think what Doug is suggesting is to change your
maybe, but i only use opt 25 in PDM on green screen - it doesn't get around
the issue that I can see to add a UDO (new acronym?). And I just don't like
having the *EVENTF parm and the PRTRVDS set to Y in the opt 25 PNLGRP, etc.
But tell me more that i'm not seeing!
workflow on the green screen. That is, for now you have to accept
that searching from RDi is going to affect the parameters for Option
25. So don't use Option 25. Instead, use your own custom PDM option
that has some of the parameters prepopulated the way you like them.
If you have a few different usage patterns, you may want to create a
few different custom options to accommodate them.
John Y.
This is the Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio Client for System i & iSeries (WDSCI-L) mailing list
To post a message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.