×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Thanks for bringing this up Buck. This is one of those message from the verifier that I've always ignored. Now I don't have to anymore.
Kurt Anderson
Sr. Programmer/Analyst - Application Development, Service Delivery Platform
-----Original Message-----
From: WDSCI-L [mailto:wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Buck Calabro
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 1:00 PM
To: wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] RDi 9.1.1 Verify INCORROUT?
On 1/6/2015 12:44 PM, Edmund Reinhardt wrote:
But Barbara's approach has the advantage that you don't have to
generate PCML to a file.
Yes, I rather like Barbara's solution. The PCML option is an interesting one, but less useful for my own personal workflow.
As as aside, it doesn't look as though the PCML preferences allow for metacharacters in the names; you know - &L, &N, and the other 'PDM-like'
choices. Am I missing something in the PCML workflow, or would I really have to remember to hit the preferences before doing every Verify where I wanted PCML?
--
--buck
'I had nothing to offer anybody except my own confusion' - Jack Kerouac
--
This is the Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio Client for System i & iSeries (WDSCI-L) mailing list To post a message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.
midrange.com
