Re: What is wrong with with definition -- WDSCI-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

On 10/20/2014 4:25 PM, Bob Cagle wrote:

I would also question if you have the correct PTFs applied.

I don't have a back level machine to test against. Suppose I have two
machines. One is at 5.4 and the other is at 7.2. I fire up RDi and
edit RPG source on both machines, typing a valid dcl-s line. Will Lpex
throw a syntax error only on the 5.4 member?

I thought that the syntax checkers are part of RDi, but then I
remembered that CL gets validated by calls to IBM i so now I don't know...
--buck

-----Original Message-----
From: WDSCI-L [mailto:wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of RPGLIST
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 2:08 PM
To: wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [WDSCI-L] What is wrong with with definition

I started playing around with "totally free" and I was defining a standalone variable like:

dcl-s xCmlCl# packed(9);

I also tried ...packed(9:0); which did not work either.

I'm starting at position 8.

Its generating an error and when I highlight it it says "Unexpected Token"

I'm sure its something really stupid but even after reading Jon Paris'
article I still can't figure this out.

Dutch

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.