Re: To be under Indicators or not to be

I would like to have a preferences option as to where they would be shown.
We have lots of legacy code that uses indicators to control display
files so I like seeing those under indicators. If it's a name not
attached to a numbered indicator I still like to see it under indicators
because the fields list is usually so long. But I know there are others
who would prefer it under fields.

Thanks for asking.

Karleen Bushard || IBM i Software Devloper || HOM Furniture, Inc ||
763.767.3777 || VM1777 || kbushard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



From: Edmund Reinhardt <edmund.reinhardt@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Date: 09/25/2012 11:44 AM
Subject: [WDSCI-L] To be under Indicators or not to be
Sent by: wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx





Ken's question about where in the Outline view to find named indicators
has
stirred things up a bit.

We would like to know if there is a strong preference to move Named
indicators under the Fields heading so that all fields can be found in one
place and only predefined indicator usage being shown under the Indicators
heading.
On the other hand would anyone be upset about not finding the Named
indicators under the Indicators heading any more?

IBM is listening.


Regards,



Edmund (E.H.) Reinhardt
COBOL IDE on AIX, DDS, WebFacing, System i Application Development,
Rational Developer for Power



2D barcode - Phone: 1-905-413-3125 | Phone: 1-905-854-6195 IBM
encoded with E-mail: edmund.reinhardt@xxxxxxxxxx
contact AIX COBOL: 8200 Warden Ave
information www.youtube.com/user/IBMRational#g/c/62DF24D5BCD43501
Markham, ON L6G 1C7
"In every thing give thanks: for this is the will of
Canada
God in Christ Jesus concerning you." - 1
Thessalonians 5:18