× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Sorry, for some reason I read that as wanting to compare sequence #'s.


Thanks, Matt

-----Original Message-----
From: wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of darren@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 1:52 PM
To: Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio Client
forSystem i & iSeries
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] Compare showing sequence number differences

I am trying to avoid it comparing source lines and dates. Our vendor
sends
us source. We modify the source. Our vendor sends us updated source.
So,
taking into account the source sequence #, almost all lines register as
a
difference, which in simple terms, is bad.




From: "Tyler, Matt" <matt.tyler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio
Client for System i & iSeries" <wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Date: 03/13/2012 03:25 PM
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] Compare showing sequence number
differences
Sent by: wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx



Have you tried the compare using iProjects? I just tried it and it
looked to me that it compared the source lines and dates.

Thanks, Matt

-----Original Message-----
From: wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of darren@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 6:52 AM
To: midrange-WDSC WDSC message board
Subject: [WDSCI-L] Compare showing sequence number differences


I'm running RDP 8. I'm trying to compare a source member with greater
than
32K records, so the SEU options don't work. I setup two filters, so
that I
can easily click on both members, and then right-click and say compare
with
each other. Every line in the source is registered as a change, and I
suspect its because of the sequence/dates. I've checked preferences
under
Lpex/Compare and Ignore Sequence #'s is checked. I tried restricting
the
columns to 13 through 80, and the results are the same.

Does anyone have any luck using the RDP compare function? While I'm at
it,
I wouldn't mind a merge function similar to the PDM merge, that would
work
with >32K record source members.

--
This is the Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio
Client for System i & iSeries (WDSCI-L) mailing list
To post a message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.
--
This is the Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio
Client for System i & iSeries (WDSCI-L) mailing list
To post a message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.