|
Well, IMO, that's just a kludge. You're taking a source control mechanism
that's not designed to work with IBM i and finding a way to wedge it in.
I think you would be better off getting a host based SVN client working and
simply adding some RSE user defined options rigged up to do your check in &
check out functions. A subsequent implementation could contribute first
class actions to the RSE popup menu to invoke the checkout & checkin.
You can easily push and pull IBM i source members for compiling at
will as well as objects that you want to version control in SVN.
True, but the development model isn't natural for IBM i.
Pessimistic locking is one way to deal with contention, but certainly not
PLUS you run the risk of two developers overwriting everyone each others
modifications ... since the IBM i project mode doesn't lock the source
member while it is being edited.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.