|
----- Message from "Mark S. Waterbury" <mark.s.waterbury@bellsouth.IBM i
net> on Thu, 10 Mar 2011 13:20:56 -0500 -----
To:
Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio Client
for System i & iSeries <wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:
Re: [WDSCI-L] Goodbye Old Friend - CODE400
Hi. Buck:
I suggest that you all need to open a DCR (Design Change Request, aka.
"enhancement request") for RDi / RDp, to tell IBM they need to add
support in the editor for REXX macros. After all, this WDSCi, RDi or
RDp is supposed to be the replacement for CODE/400 ... is it not?
That's my opinion.
All the best,
Mark S. Waterbury
> On 3/10/2011 12:57 PM, Buck wrote:
On 3/9/2011 1:00 PM, John Larimer wrote:
I think the time has finally come. We upgraded our machine going to
RPG.v7.1 from v5r4 and CODE400 can't verify newly introduced features in
mostto CODE400.I've been using CODE400 daily since about 1999.
I've made several attempts transition to WDSC/RDi/RDp, all failures.
Today I am on RDp 7.6.0.
There are two things always bothered me about this tool compared
No support for extending the editor like we could with REXX Macros. I
created a fairly significant library of macros and found that the
macro. Myuseful and productive were based off of the IBM supplied FIELDS
formacros looped through the resulting field definitions generating code
fields toD-Specs (work fields, structures and so on), C-Specs (comparing
typeswork fields, moving data to/from work fields) and generating various
reducedof SQL statements. These macros saved me huge amounts of time and
it,keying errors.A kindred spirit! I salute you. For what it's worth, I have been
current on the GUI IDE product up until Rational began charging for
Iso I'm hovering on WDSC 7.0.0.8 against i/OS 5.4 for the time being. I
dearly miss macros. I played with the Eclipse Monkey project (now
defunct) but without knowing the guts of Eclipse and Lpex as it were,
machine,made very little progress.
I must tell you that not only is Code/400 still on my Windows 7
I still use it specifically for the macro capability. Rexx is WAY
EASIER to write and debug for macros than anything I've tried with
Eclipse. Apparently, Eclipse-using developers aren't interested in
macros. You'll find there are the merest handful of IBM i developers
who are interested in macros.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.