Hey, just think about what was written:

I'm asking just for the tools (RDi) to parse the documentation and display it on hover and you are asking for a change in the compiler (because I think that would mean a new keyword) AND a change in the tools (RDi) to display the info.

So now what is too much?!


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von i5
Gesendet: Samstag, 23. Mai 2009 11:17
An: Websphere Development Studio Client for iSeries
Betreff: Re: [WDSCI-L] Application Diagram View --- Suggestion forRPGto havesomething like JAVADOC for subproceduresandsubroutines andmodules etc

Original Message:
From: "Schmidt, Mihael" <Mihael.Schmidt@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Though it would be nice to have some docs for programs and procedures attached to the prototypes and have it on-the-fly in RDi and hopefully without having to manually refresh the outline every time which really sucks. So we can have the docs of the program/procedure if we hover over the program/procedure in code and if we use code completion.

Docs maybe is too much, even a simple keyword COMMENT('Some help text') will be GREAT.

Just a dreamer .


Sent with DeskNow Lite - Free mail & groupware server http://www.desknow.com

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2022 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.