|
I was reading an article from Alex Woodie this morning (
http://www.itjungle.com/fhs/fhs071508-story03.html) and it seems it is
basically giving an EOL (End Of Life) to Webfacing. In exchange IBM is
directing people towards EGL.
Because my exposure to Webfacing has been minimal (just played with it) I am
curious to know how much "change" this actually is, concerning how much code
or processes will need to be migrated. For example, lets say somebody fully
embraced Webfacing when it first came out and they now have over 1000
screens using it (with customizations). I am guessing they are out of luck
in a really bad way - right? Because the customizations they have done will
basically need to be re-done/re-written using EGL? Are there migration
tools?
I am curious as I have customers who have fully embraced Webfacing.
Thanks for anybody that can shed light on the subject,
Aaron Bartell
http://mowyourlawn.com
--
This is the Websphere Development Studio Client for iSeries (WDSCI-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.