× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Joe,

I'd just like to know one thing.

When you say "web development", do you also mean the html editor?

Because I don't use any of the Java, WebSphere, etc things, but do
occasionally make a static html page in WDSCi.

Thanks,

Peter Colpaert
Application Developer, Consumer Luminaires

Industrieterrein Satenrozen 11, 2550 Kontich, Belgium
Tel. +32/ 3 450 74 09, Fax +32/ 3 450 74 33, Internal 1317
peter.colpaert@xxxxxxxxxxx, www.philips.com



The information contained in this message is confidential and may be
legally privileged. The message is intended solely for the addressee(s).
If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
use, dissemination, or reproduction is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender
by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.






Joe Pluta <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
06/03/2008 20:51
Please respond to
Websphere Development Studio Client for iSeries <wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


To
Websphere Development Studio Client for iSeries <wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc

Subject
Re: [WDSCI-L] Is RDi really a "new" product?






Dean, Robert wrote:
I think you just answered your own question. The reason to plug 3rd
party stuff into WDSC is so that we don't have to push IBM to devote the
resources to support it.

For example, IBM is focusing its strategic investments on JSF/EGL, and
also on RESTful stuff like that delivered in Project Zero. I don't need
IBM to support (for example) Struts, Tapestry, Wicket, Seam, or any number
of other frameworks if I can add third-party plugins that provide that
support to WDSC/RDi.

You questioned someone last week because they had separate workspaces
for EGL and non-EGL work. I don't want to have separate Eclipse instances
for IBM-provided and non-IBM-provided plugins.

You're kind of missing the point of RDi. Unlike WDSC, RDi is not
designed as a web application development environment and will not be
supported as one. It's a single-purpose tool. RDi-SOA is RDi plus EGL,
again single-purpose. Not meant for development of any other
framework. If you start plugging stuff into it and it breaks, IBM won't
support it. If you are planning to do web development, you need a
different tool, such as RAD, or one of the many Eclipse-based tool
offerings, such as MyEclipse.

Joe

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.