× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



DeLong, Eric wrote:
Brandon,

I'll not try to put words in Joe's mouth, but I read his point as "On systems where all access is via network port, SEU offers no better access than the client toolsets (WDSC, RDi, Code/400)". With twinax, one could access the system whether the network was up or down. SEU offered a reliable means of maintaing source when networks were unavailable.
Thanks, Eric! That's exactly what I was getting at. Evidently my writing skills are eroding in this late stage of my career. Yes, that's why I asked the question: if there is no twinax on the box whatsoever, then what situations can you use SEU but not RDi? The point being that if TCP/IP is down, neither SEU nor RDi will work. While I understand there is be a "special" Ethernet port that works even when i5/OS doesn't, can you load up enough of the stack to actually run SEU on it?

Personally, I hope the answer is yes, and that IBM always includes one copy of SEU, no matter how limited in function.

Joe

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.