Re: Option *LSTDBG

Luis;

I have looked at my compile command for OPM COBOL, and I have mine set to
*SRCDBG as the default. To get there, right click on the source member in a
list, choose Compile>Work With Compile Commands. You can set your defaults
there.

HTH

Jim

On Jan 30, 2008 9:33 AM, Luis Colorado <LuisC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hello all!

I have a problem that I didn't have with version 6 of WDSC. I have to
maintain OPM COBOL programs. When I compile for debugging, I liked to use
the *LSTDBG option instead of *SRCDBG. By using *LSTDBG, I could debug my
COBOL code on the output listing. This was extremely useful, because it
allowed me stepping through copybooks and seeing other compiler-generated
information (e.g., statement number).

However, starting version 7, the environment default (actually, forces
you) to use the option *SRCDBG.

I can't specify *LSTDBG any more. If I prompt the compile option and
remove the default option *SRCDBG and replace it with *LSTDBG, it will add
the *SRCDBG option after I submit the compilation.

The result is nasty, because I get an error saying something like *SRCDBG
and *LSTDBG can't be used at the same time, so the compiler just compiles
without debugging information.

I also tried to edit the compile command, but WDSC still adds the *SRCDBG
option.

Is there a way to get rid of the *SRCDBG option when compiling?

Thank you all!

Luis

-----Original Message-----
From: wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Joe Pluta
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 10:18 AM
To: Websphere Development Studio Client for iSeries
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] IBM Rational Developer for System i V7.1

Trevor Perry wrote:

Jon,

Would it be prudent for IBM to offer to run CVTRPGSRC over all of JDE's

code

for them? I know there are some logistics issues for delivery, etc...

but

for a small amount of effort by IBM, a large number of JDE customers

could

be moved away from the legacy compilers?

Just a small PR investment could positively impact our community??

Trevor

If IBM does indeed decide to make a modernization center, I'd like to
see this as one of their pilot projects.

However, remember that many of these shops will have large amounts of
customized code, and so all of that code will need to be converted as
well, and I don't think IBM will want to do all of that for free.

Joe
--
This is the Websphere Development Studio Client for iSeries (WDSCI-L)
mailing list
To post a message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.
--
This is the Websphere Development Studio Client for iSeries (WDSCI-L)
mailing list
To post a message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.